Everything You Wanted To Know About Rolling Shutter

Udi Tirosh

Udi Tirosh is an entrepreneur, photography inventor, journalist, educator, and writer based in Israel. With over 25 years of experience in the photo-video industry, Udi has built and sold several photography-related brands. Udi has a double degree in mass media communications and computer science.

Everything You Wanted To Know About Rolling Shutter

Rolling Shutter is the way that most DSLR are shooting video. (and point and shoots and iPhones too). For 95% of the time it does not really matter what type of shutter is used for capturing video, in the other 5% it matters a lot. Following is a break down and explanation of what is Rolling Shutter why it is being used and what are its quarks.

Rolling Shutter vs. Total Shutter

Rolling Shutter, usually found in CMOS sensors is a method of capturing image that does not expose the entire sensor simultaneously, but rather exposes different parts of the sensor in different points in time.

Total Shutter act as we intuitively think about shutters. No light is hitting the sensor, then light is hitting the entire sensor array for a brief amount of time (say 1/10th of a second), then the senor is blocked again. The entire sensor captures the same moment in time.

Rolling Shutter acts a bit differently. Imagine a slit traveling across the sensor, from top to bottom, exposing each part of the sensor for that same brief amount of time (1/10th of a second). But, since the slit is traveling, the top part of the sensor and the bottom part of the sensor are capturing different moments in time.

Now, this is not an actual physical shutter that is moving across the frame, but rather the sensor telling different parts of it to collect light.

Here is a short demonstration of how rolling shutter works in a simplified 10×10 CMOS sensor.

What Is Rolling Shutter And Why It Is Cool

Why It Matters?

Generally speaking, CCD sensors utilize a Total Shutter and CMOS sensors utilize Rolling Shutter. While there are many reasons for camera manufacturers to choose one type of sensor over the other – processing speed, power consumption, cost, complexity and more, CMOS sensors (which use the rolling shutter method) tend to deliver the image faster, thus clearing the sensor for the next shot.

This may not be an issue with stills, but is a huge factor when selecting a sensor type for video – the sensors needs to take 24,30 or 60 frames a second. This is why almost all our DSLR and Smartphones sensors are using rolling shutters.

Oddly enough, this is also when we can most noticeably see the effect of Rolling Shutter. Especially with fast moving or vibrating objects.

Here is what an airplane propeller looks like when shot with a rolling shutter.

YouTube video

and here is why

YouTube video

Finally here is a comparison of a propeller looks like when using a Rolling Shutter vs a Total shutter.

YouTube video

When Will This Happens?

You get the most noticeable Rolling Shutter effect when the camera and the object you photograph change in relations to one another with the “roll” of the shutter. In most cameras the shutter rolls for about 1/30 of a second and during that time any movement is hardly noticeable. But you get a distinct Rolling shutter effect when you shoot a fast moving object like an airplane propeller.

But this is not the only case, imagine shooting a still image from the window of a fast moving car. Say you are shooting a person. Since the sensor is moving in relation to the subject the same rolling shutter effect will happen. Here is a simplified graphical explanation taken with our 10×10 CMOS sensor. It is a bit exasperated with such a small sensor and a fast moving man, but the idea is the same for every picture you take through a window of a moving vehicle.

What Is Rolling Shutter And Why It Is Cool

Luckily, you would need to drive very fast for this effect to be noticeable. But if you were wondering why trees look a bit diagonal in pictures taken from a moving train, this is why.

Rolling Shutter and Sync Speeds

If you are doing any kind of flash photography, there is a good chance you are familiar with a close relative of the rolling shutter – Partial Flash sync.

When DSLRs are exposing the sensors, they usually so it by moving two curtains to reveal the sensor, the first curtain slides from top to bottom to expose the sensor, and then a second curtain moves from top to bottom to hide it.

In high shutter speeds, the second curtain may start hiding the sensor before the first curtain finished its move. when this happens, an actual slit is traveling across the sensor.

In this case, when the flash pops only part of the sensor is getting hit with the light from the flash. There is a great reading about this on the tangents blog.

It’s Not All Bad

Just before we wrap up, I don’t want you to think that rolling shutter is all bad. While it is a pain in the neck for most applications, it allows for some pretty cool applications as well. Like watching the waveform of guitar strings.

YouTube video

[Propeller image by Jason Mullins]

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

Udi Tirosh

Udi Tirosh

Udi Tirosh is an entrepreneur, photography inventor, journalist, educator, and writer based in Israel. With over 25 years of experience in the photo-video industry, Udi has built and sold several photography-related brands. Udi has a double degree in mass media communications and computer science.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

10 responses to “Everything You Wanted To Know About Rolling Shutter”

  1. asad137 Avatar
    asad137

    Just a heads up — the effect in the last video is not due to rolling shutter (the video creator is wrong). It’s due simply to the frame rate of the camera and the frequency of the strings causing time-domain aliasing. You would see the same thing with a CCD-based videocamera, or even a film videocamera. It’s the exact same effect that causes car wheels to look like they’re stationary or running backwards at certain speeds on video or film.

    1. 4krev Avatar
      4krev

      Don’t you mean motion blur?

    2. Dan Avatar
      Dan

      I disagree. Each frame shows the time-domain waveform. So it is not just the framerate. It is the rolling shutter. If a global shutter was used, you would just see the entire string displaced up or down. You could still get some interesting aliasing effects, but you would now see the cool waveform on the string.

    3. Lee James Avatar
      Lee James

      I disagree too. Strummed guitar strings simply wobble up and down. They do not take on the curly patterns of waveforms! That is impossible. In order to see how vibrating objects move over time (ie a waveform) you need oscillator, which a rolling shutter emulates.

    4. TechNic Avatar
      TechNic

      The “video creator”, you mean the web page creator, is not wrong.
      What you guys are seeing, actually, IS captured by a rolling shutter. The wagon wheel effect is also visible – that is what is causing the waveforms to scroll left or right at different speeds ( depending on the audio frequencies compared to camera frame rate).

    5. Mark Rejhon Avatar
      Mark Rejhon

      Chief Blur Buster here. (creator of advanced motion tests such as http://www.testufo.com/persistence and others, and an author of a peer reviewed motion test conference paper) — I have to disagree as well. While the frame rate is a variable too, the rolling shutter is also a simultaneous variable too, creating the artifacts in the last video. The mathematical formulas for waveforms actually corroborate with a rolling shutter mechanic, so there’s irrefutable evidence that the video creator is correct.

    6. tincho81 Avatar
      tincho81

      these people saying it’s the rolling shutter have no idea what they talk about. You’re right asad137.

  2. asad137 Avatar
    asad137

    “I remember seeing this fantastic memory of a Helicopter flying and using
    this effect, it looked like the blades were perfectly still”

    That’s actually not due to rolling shutter. That’s due to aliasing, or the interaction between the blade rotation frequency and the frame rate of the camera. You’d see the same effect with CMOS, CCD, or film.

  3. makautomaticdoors Avatar
    makautomaticdoors

    Its a really nice website. Thanks for giving full information about Rolling Shutter. You can also visit makautomaticdoors.com