This is Fujifilm’s most underrated lens

Mark G Adams

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

Fujifilm has released some amazing lenses. In fact, there is not really a lens that is not capable, or not sharp enough to please even the toughest critics. However, because Fujifilm have an XF range and an XC range, targeting quality build and higher price over lower price and not so good build quality (compared to the XF premium lenses), some Fujifilm users dismiss the XC series of lenses outright. But among them all, there’s a hidden gem that every Fujifilm user should use.

An introduction into XF versus XC lenses

Different people have different budgets, and so Fujifilm caters for these markets having two different lens formats.

The XF lenses are the most expensive, being usually better made than the XC lenses, with metal mounts, usually an aperture ring (the XF 27mm F/2.8 version 1 doesn’t have an aperture ring), sometimes weather resistant (signified by a WR) and glass coated with slightly different optical coatings.

The XC lenses generally miss out on most of these, and they never have an aperture ring (and so must be controlled by one of your dial’s). Also they are considerably less expensive than their XF counterparts, making them ideal for those on a budget.

In terms of the quality of image, the XC lenses usually have more than acceptable sharpness, but the savings in price usually means that the lens aperture range is not as good as it’s XF counterparts, and thus suited more for daylight shooting.

Fujifilm’s most underrated lens

There’s no surprise that Fujifilm’s most underrated lens an XC lens, the Fuji XC50-230mm F/4.5-6.7 OIS II. A lightweight, telephoto lens, made of plastic with no aperture ring. As you can see by the introductory photograph, it’s a small lens!

Taking a look at this lens in more detail, it has a focal range 35mm equivalent of 76mm-350mm, is 111mm-177mm in length, has a minimum focus distance of 1.1 metres and 3.5 stops of image stabilisation.

What makes it so great are a number of factors.

  1. Lightweight and small.
  2. Pretty fast autofocus to capture birds in flight and aircraft (when used in my case on an X-T3 and an X-T20).
  3. Great sharpness wide open and even better stopped down slightly for excellent image quality.

This lens is not the fastest lens when it comes to its aperture, so don’t expect a really shallow depth of field on more distant objects, or expect to use it without cracking up the ISO or using a tripod in lower light.

Thankfully, most Fujifilm cameras tend to be very good at higher ISO values, so you can still use this lens handheld during dying light when shooting wide open and trusting that the ISO will be acceptable

Over the years I’ve had some amazing photographs with the 50-230mm, in all weathers. It may not be weather resistant, but like all camera equipment, it won’t die if it gets a little wet and you make sure you dry it off as soon as you can.

Here are some example images taken with the XC50-230mm. All images can be viewed full screen, and full EXIF data is included. Also visit the latest Photographing Birds In Flight article to see the lens put through its paces.

Conclusion

It’s cheap, it’s affordable, it’s light and most importantly, it’s reliable. I’ve just given a few examples of objects that might test the lens, although mostly taken at 230mm, there are some around 50mm and 120mm.

The XC50-230mm is my favourite zoom lens that can be taken anywhere, and which takes little room in the camera bag. Its output is excellent and I will add raw files in the coming days for you to examine. At the price it is, especially second hand, don’t hesitate! Just buy it!

About the Author

Mark Adams is a documentary photographer, blogger, and writer based in Port Talbot, Wales. On his website One Camera One Lens you’ll find plenty of his photos, as well as interesting articles about photography. Head over to Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter and follow Mark for more of his work. This article was also published here and shared with permission.

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

DIPY Icon

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 responses to “This is Fujifilm’s most underrated lens”

  1. Dušan DuPe Pethö Avatar
    Dušan DuPe Pethö

    …really?

  2. Z80A Avatar
    Z80A

    Aldo consider the XC 16-50 OIS Mk II from the same series for similar reasons. Dirt cheap second hand.

    1. Vladimir Kirillovskiy Avatar
      Vladimir Kirillovskiy

      Yes, agree and I’ve tested xc16-50 against xf18-55 and image quality was better out of XC lens.

      1. Crimson Hikari Avatar
        Crimson Hikari

        I’m biased because I don’t have the XC 16-50mm (and do have the XF 18-55mm) but I would definitely agree that the XC lenses punch above their weight! The 16-50mm is also reportedly a half-decent option for trying infrared photography; apparently it’s good to around f8.

  3. Igor Danowitz Avatar
    Igor Danowitz

    Its Not a good lens!

    1. Russell hawker Avatar
      Russell hawker

      You’re right, it’s not good lens. It’s a very good lens.

  4. Benson Stein Avatar
    Benson Stein

    Shhhhh! The prices will go up now. Epic lens.

  5. Shoot More Film Avatar
    Shoot More Film

    I have it just in case I need a telephoto. I don’t use it too much but it’s light (weighs less than a 70-300) and is great optically if you have the right light ( a whole lot better than the old Minolta and Nikon 70-300 lenses) . I use it on the XH1, no probs with it at all.