Can a $500 Lens Really Compete with a $3000 lens?

Most of us want to take the best photos we possibly can, and we are always told that spending money on ‘good glass’ is the best way to do that. But also, many of us don’t have unlimited funds, so it can be tempting to take advantage of cheaper lenses. After all, a lens can’t possibly be two grand better, surely?

In this video, wedding photographer Katelyn James compares the budget Canon RF 85mm f/2.0 ($549) with two much more expensive L lenses, the RF 85mm f1.2L ($2799) and RF 100mm Macro f/2.8 ($1199). Here’s what she discovered.

The Contenders: RF 85mm f/2 vs. RF 85mm f/1.2

The RF 85mm f/2 is part of Canon’s introductory RF lens lineup. It boasts a wide f/2 aperture, built-in image stabilization, and macro capabilities—all for just $500. On the other hand, the RF 85mm f/1.2 is a premium lens known for its creamy bokeh, tack-sharp clarity, and ability to separate subjects from the background like magic.

Katelyn’s experiment wasn’t about declaring a winner but rather determining if the RF 85mm f/2 could deliver professional-quality results for wedding photographers on a budget.

First Impressions: Lightweight but Promising

Katelyn’s initial reaction to the RF 85mm f/2 was mixed. Compared to the hefty RF 85mm f/1.2, the f/2 version felt “cheap” and “plasticky” on her camera. However, she was pleasantly surprised by its speed and focus accuracy, especially when photographing her kids in chaotic, fast-moving situations.

If you’re used to heavier lenses, the lightweight design of the RF 85mm f/2 might feel underwhelming at first. But don’t let that deter you—its performance might just win you over.

Test #1: Macro Capabilities

One of the standout features of the RF 85mm f/2 is its macro ability, which Katelyn tested against the RF 100mm f/2.8 Macro. While the RF 85mm f/2 couldn’t get as close to the subject as the 100mm macro, it still delivered respectable results.

For wedding photographers, this means you can capture ring shots and detail shots without needing a dedicated macro lens. However, if you’re a product photographer or need extreme close-ups, the RF 85mm f/2 might feel limiting.

Pro Tip: When shooting macro with the RF 85mm f/2, focus on strong composition to make up for the inability to get extremely close.

Test #2: Image Stabilization

The RF 85mm f/2’s built-in image stabilization impressed Katelyn. Even at slower shutter speeds, the lens delivered sharp images, making it a reliable choice for low-light wedding scenarios.

That said, she noted that image stabilization shouldn’t be the sole reason to choose this lens over the RF 85mm f/1.2. If budget allows, the f/1.2’s wider aperture and superior bokeh might still be worth the investment.

Pro Tip: Use image stabilization to your advantage in dimly lit venues, but don’t rely on it as a crutch. Always aim for proper technique and steady hands.

Test #3: Portrait Performance

When it came to portraits, the RF 85mm f/2 held its own. While the RF 85mm f/1.2 produced creamier bokeh and slightly brighter images, the differences were subtle. Katelyn found the RF 85mm f/2’s portraits to be sharp, professional, and more than adequate for wedding photography.

If you’re just starting out or on a tight budget, the RF 85mm f/2 is a fantastic option for capturing stunning portraits without breaking the bank.

Final Verdict: Is the RF 85mm f/2 Worth It?

Katelyn’s conclusion? The RF 85mm f/2 is a solid choice for wedding photographers, especially those just starting out. It combines portrait and macro capabilities in one affordable package, making it a versatile addition to any kit. However, if you’re a seasoned pro or have the budget, the RF 85mm f/1.2’s superior bokeh and low-light performance might still be worth the splurge.

Katelyn’s experiment with the Canon RF 85mm f/2 proves that you don’t need to spend a fortune to achieve professional-quality results. Whether you’re a wedding photographer on a budget or simply looking for a versatile, lightweight lens, the RF 85mm f/2 is a worthy contender.

You can watch the video below: